Home > Robots > Alexander > The Event | |
The Event |
10. | Do you have an extra outlet we can plug into? |
9. | You have fresh coffee??!! |
8. | Can you be quiet while we videotape over here? |
7. | I fight YOU next? |
6. | I like your webpage. |
5. | The whole scene with Blendo sucks. |
4. | Will you sign my poster? |
3. | Will you sign my girlfriend? |
2. | got steel? |
1. | Doesn't this go any faster? |
Here is Mark Setrakian getting "Snake" ready for a round. I can only think of a few things I've been in awe over in my life; seeing Snake in action augmented my list. It writhed, turned and rolled in the arena. If for no other reason than to see it realtime, you should buy the '97 video when it's available. Built in 12 days, the robot had a few last minute problems, generating "that thing sucked" comments from the audience and the Internet. Since similiar comments were directed at the Ax, I'm glad to be in such good company. | ||
Snake was controlled with a "WAC" which Mark is holding here. The body of Snake mimicked the shape of the WAC, using closed loop servo amps in its body. The most amazing part to me is not that Mark built this 300+ lb. machine, but that he understands how a snake body moves along the ground... | ||
My friend James Underwood built the "Defiant," an excellent lightweight fabbed mostly out of carbon fiber laminate. Utilizing pneumatics to articulate an arm similar to Biohazard, James displayed excellent driving skills in the arena. It was most entertaining watching the melee, where he tossed other lightweight 'bots into the saws of Pretty Hate Machine in an attempt to disable it. Great stuff. | ||
On Saturday morning I had the privilege of performing a "demo" of the Alexander for the audience. Joel Hodgson, creater of Mystery Science Theater 3000 interviewed me in the arena. Other robots that were invited to demo were "Z" and Snake. | ||
Here I'm doing some last minute tweaking to the video transmitter in the pit. I remembered to glypt the inductors into the coils this year, but somehow it still detuned slightly. A really good guess of which 2pF variable cap to tweak brought everything back into sync. | ||
This match should be titled "Sandbagged." Spinning blade Alexander v. Stuffie the furry bear. The Ax wins the match by a single point, unwilling to saw into the stufffed bear and eliciting jeers from the crowd. Here we've just decapitated the Barbie doll. Why, at this point, isn't the Edger embedded in the hood of the Jeep? The chain had broken and the arm flopped left and right. It was nearly impossible for Dave to control. | ||
A strikingly colorful robot, "Z" from the Semborg guys, sported a high speed center punch on the front. I was shocked to learn that it was powered by expanding gas from a .223 caliber blank round, fired in a breach mounted in a block of aluminum. I'm not exactly sure how they got around the "no explosives" rule but the scheme was too powerful for their design, and even the shocks and springs they used kept disintegrating when it was fired. | ||
A couple of weeks before the event, Tony Buchignani came over and we did a bit of work on the new "Wedge of Doom" in my shop. Tony is now Featherweight champ two years in a row. He is also characteristic of the great sportsmanship at the event; in one battle he drove over and unflipped "Dough Boy" from the wall so the driver, 10-year-old Lisa Winter, could compete some more. By the way, Wod2 really kicked butt. To the right, Tony put it to work cleaning up the shop before he left. |
Have you started planning a robot for next year?
Yes and no. I'm currently relaxing with my wife, which I expect to continue doing through October. I am somewhat reluctant to enter the event next year considering the problems I encountered with some judges this year.
If you do enter, what class will it be in?
Probably heavyweight, since it seems to get all the breaks. I think middleweight is harder to design for but nobody seems to care, especially the judges and audience.
My friend Rich believes there are three independent goals in Robot Wars: design to win the trophy, to entertain the audience or to encourage your peers. Few robots achieve all three goals, in fact some are flat-out contradictory. Since the trophy-goal was wrapped in somewhat erratic judging this year, I can't view it as a target to base 8 more months of work on. I won't play a game based on dynamic rules.
If not for the trophy, then why enter at all?
If I view Robot Wars as a forum to demo some cool technology and design, then I can at least be an encouragement to the future robot builders out there. If one high school student decides to take calculus in college because they want to get into robotics, then I'm willing to put up with the audience booing me, or having Jef Raskin yell at me from the judges' table.
What changes will you make for '98 if you enter?
Show up and find out. But there might be sneak preview of some possible Agrippa technology here...
Anything else going on we should know about?